Calculus is all about relating the change in one quantity to another quantity.
Imagine it this way: You have a box full of marbles, and you decide to put some more in. $A$ is the variable representing the amount of marbles, while $B$ is the variable representing the amount of marbles that you put in. If you had $A_1$ marbles at the beginning, you have
marbles following your action. This is the most fundamental algebraic pattern that characterizes balance laws.
Take the first law of thermodynamics for example—a.k.a. balance of energy. We have
where $U$ is the internal energy of a closed system, $Q$ is the amount of heat supplied to the system, and $W$ is the amount of work done on the system on its surroundings. Here, $A\equiv U$ and $B\equiv Q+W$. Despite having three quantities, it is the combined effect of two which is related to the remaining quantity. Balance laws derived by physicists and chemists can get quite complex and hard to understand.
It’s always that the change in one quantity is related to the combined effect of remaining quantities. Keeping separate track of your main variable $A$ and affecting variables that compose $B$ gives you a mental model which helps you remember and even build your own balance laws.
Let $A: t \to A(t)$ be a function of time. We can rewrite the equation in terms of the change in $A$ in a time period $\Var t$:
where the new variable $C$ represents the change in quantity in $\Var t$ amount of time. In our previous analogy, $C$ is the amount of marbles put in, say, a minute. As $\Var t \to 0$, we have
This prototypical balance law allows us to relate the rates of change of quantities.
Let’s introduce time into the balance of energy. The equation becomes
where the new quantities $P_T$ and $P_M$ are called thermal power and mechanical power, representing the thermal and mechanical work done on the system per unit time, respectively. Given power functions and initial conditions, integrating them would give us the evolution of the internal energy through time.
Let’s say we are not satisfied with an abstract box where the amount of stuff that goes in is measured automatically. We want to write a balance law over different shapes of bodies and we need to specify exactly where the stuff goes in and out.
To do that, we need to rephrase our laws to work over a continuous domain. The branch of physics that focuses on such problems is called continuum mechanics.
We introduce our spatial domain $\Omega$ and its boundary $\del\Omega$. Our quantities now vary over both space and time, so we need to integrate them over the whole domain in order to relate them:
- $a(x,t)$ is the variable representing the main continuous quantity,
- $b(x,t)$ is the variable representing the rate of change of the quantity inside the domain,
- and $\Bc(x,t)$ is the variable representing the negative rate of change of the quantity on the boundary of the domain—negative due to surface normals $\Bn$ having outward direction by definition.
Notice that when we introduce space, our prototypical balance law needs an additional vectorial quantity, $\Bc$. In physical laws, one needs to differentiate actions inside a body from actions on the surface of the body. That’s because one is over a volume and the other over an area, and they have to be integrated separately.
The area integral is actually a flux where the vectorial quantity $\Bc$ is penetrating the surface with a given direction. Given that it’s positive when stuff exits the domain, it’s called the efflux of the underlying quantity. Similarly, we name the rate of change field $b$ as the supply of the underlying quantity, because it being positive results in an increase.
The idea is to get rid of the integrals by a process called “localization”. In order to localize, we have to convert the surface integral into a volume integral using the divergence theorem:
Assuming $\Omega$ doesn’t move, we can also write
Collecting the results, we have
Notice that all integrals are over $\Omega$ now. This allows us to make the balance law more strict by enforcing it point-wise:
This is the localized version of the prototypical balance law that is used everywhere in continuum mechanics. Unfortunately, I can’t give the energy balance example, because it would require too many additional definitions. For that, I recommend the excellent Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity by Marsden and Hughes.
In physics and chemistry, one shouldn’t blindly memorize formulas, but try to see the underlying logic. In this case, I tried to elucidate balance laws, which all build upon the same algebraic and geometrical concepts. I went from discrete to continuous by introducing time and space to the equations, which became more complex but retained the same idea: putting things in a box and trying to calculate how that changes the contents.