Post @onusoz · /2026/08/14 · 05:37 PM View on Lol now think how 27b would compare to the quantized opus 4.6 anthropic served us, instead of the full precision one reported in the benchmark Too bad they can't quantize our 27b @sudoingX · Aug 14, 2026 holy shit! look at the table qwen just published for the 27b. beating opus 4.6 max on computer use, 84.3 vs 72.7 on osworld. beating it on mobile use, 81.9 vs 62. beating it on multimodal software engineering. and visual math isn't even close, 94.6 vs 65.5. and i'll verify what i can locally, but the shape is unmistakable. this thing runs on a single rtx 3090. a 2020 gamer card. native vision, 262k context, apache 2.0, and the gguf ladder went live the same minute as the weights. frontier table numbers in a size that fits 24gb of vram, this just added five more years to every consumer card in the world. q4_k_m is already flying onto mine. i will drop honest numbers tonight. Show more Image hidden
@onusoz · /2026/08/14 · 05:37 PM View on Lol now think how 27b would compare to the quantized opus 4.6 anthropic served us, instead of the full precision one reported in the benchmark Too bad they can't quantize our 27b @sudoingX · Aug 14, 2026 holy shit! look at the table qwen just published for the 27b. beating opus 4.6 max on computer use, 84.3 vs 72.7 on osworld. beating it on mobile use, 81.9 vs 62. beating it on multimodal software engineering. and visual math isn't even close, 94.6 vs 65.5. and i'll verify what i can locally, but the shape is unmistakable. this thing runs on a single rtx 3090. a 2020 gamer card. native vision, 262k context, apache 2.0, and the gguf ladder went live the same minute as the weights. frontier table numbers in a size that fits 24gb of vram, this just added five more years to every consumer card in the world. q4_k_m is already flying onto mine. i will drop honest numbers tonight. Show more Image hidden